Previously posted on my Facebook Page.
A day’s BAD news or "Trump demonization imperatives" in today's journalism, and my response/s: <>Politico: “Urgent motion filed to stop carving of Trump's name into Institute of Peace building.” Again, what’s the big deal? Fact: Numerous landmark U.S. structures, federal buildings, and facilities are named in honor of Presidents of the United States (POTUS). <>Associated Press: “Senators from both parties unsettled by lack of clear answers from Pentagon.” The SOP (that journalists like me are aware of): The Pentagon does not reveal everything to lawmakers, and communication is heavily restricted and filtered through official channels. Especially in these internet/partisan fire days.
<>Associated Press: “Trump's new rule reverses decades of endangered species enforcement.” Historically, the U.S. position on endangered species enforcement has evolved from early localized game management into one of the most stringent, legally binding federal frameworks in the world. This evolution is marked by a shift from loose, voluntary interstate trade coordination to strict federal mandates that prioritize species survival over economic and industrial interests. (Most of these words are “googled” from previous media data.)
<>CBS: “Farmer who voted for Trump says farmers are all just in survival mode.” Survival mode, uh huh? Fact: An average of roughly 100,000 undocumented border encounters or apprehensions are tallied per year, until the Joe Biden years when the numbers spiked to 1 million+ average. (But note that online data has been “edited,” saying a million cross each year.) Ergo, as Mr Trump’s ICE brought back numbers to pre-2021-2024, apparently farmowners (and factory owners) lost their “illegal” laborers that they used to pay measly coins with no benefits. And so on and so forth. ๐ฐ๐ป๐ฐ
Politico: “House passes Russia sanctions bill, overcoming significant Democratic opposition.” Political blah. The fact is, the U.S. still trades with Russia (war or no war), though at significantly reduced levels compared to past years due to ongoing sanctions and restrictions. Official data from the U.S. Census Bureau: The U.S. continues to record monthly transactions. For instance, U.S. goods exports to Russia were around $66 million last month. Direct trade is largely restricted to non-prohibited goods, such as specific agricultural products, fertilizers, or certain raw materials that are exempt from broad sanctions.
You might argue that the House bill is more recent, right? How much “more recent” news the media tossed to blur the facts, anyway? In fact, the Trump administration disclosed months ago that the U.S. has resumed importing oil from Russia. (Russia was ranked 4th in oil imports to the U.S. during Mr Trump’s first POTUS years.) And during the first year of the Ukraine war, Russian processed oil products were still finding their way to America, via India. You may also Google EU countries that haven’t really stopped buying oil/natural gas from Moscow, regardless of so-called sanctions. ๐๐ฝ๐
Associated Press: “Hundreds of thousands rally in Iran amid call to take up arms.” So what is this? Propaganda war, AI-induced “visuals,” or the world is simply whacked? This photo tells the world that the Iranian people (mostly women?) have forgotten the IRGC savagery in January? Iranian security forces committed widespread mass killings and crimes against humanity during the suppression of countrywide anti-government protests that escalated dramatically early this year. That’s according to a report by the UN Independent International Fact-Finding Mission on Iran.
Moreover, human rights organizations have documented that thousands of protesters and bystanders (12,000 and 30,000) were killed by state security forces using live ammunition, sniper fire, and heavy weapon crackdowns across all 31 provinces. Additionally, tens of thousands were arbitrarily detained, facing severe torture and expedited execution sprees. This massive wickedness, I insist, forced the U.S. or President Trump to launch a military hit in February–but only after negotiations to avoid it didn't work.
So what is this AP “report” actually saying? I get the “anti-U.S.” hate ingrained in Shia Iran’s hardliners. That is a historical given, but it doesn’t mean I’d just bite an obvious “doomsday pitch,” such as this. ☮️๐ฎ๐ท☮️
Reuters: “Trump responds to the EU suggesting Canada could be an associate member.” Says The D: “A hostile act.” Uh huh. As for my take on this drama, I am baffled that the EU, while lodged in individual internal strife and a collective economic “growth” steady at below 1 percent, still entertains Mark Carney’s whinings (versus Mr Trump). Clearly, the West is into political Netflix-styled episodes, while "rival" China and the BRICS bloc remain hot and high on trade, quietly.
Sure, G7 still rules the global economic roost, but BRICS is relentlessly progressing, or expanding. BRICS member countries control approximately 24 percent to 25 percent of total global exports and trade. So while the EU’s NATO upgrades the military expansion and wastage of resources, China and India et al focus on business.
As of 2026, BRICS comprises 11 official member countries: Founders Brazil, Russia, India, and China, plus South Africa (joined 2010), and recent buddies Egypt, Ethiopia, Iran, Saudi Arabia, United Arab Emirates, and Indonesia. Partner countries: Belarus, Bolivia, Cuba, Kazakhstan, Malaysia, Nigeria, Thailand, Uganda, Uzbekistan, and Vietnam.
But these “rivals” don’t need to fight or be quarrelsome with each other. Yet they may compete or be partners in trade, regardless of political “differences.” ☮️☮️☮️
Deadline: “Sydney Sweeney’s sports betting ad has female athletes pushing back.” I reckon, those females are driven by the culture war caterwaul, and that Ms Sweeney is essentially stereotyped as a Conservative. The whiners argue that the ad “sexualizes women's sports and undermines years of work to be taken seriously on athletic merit rather than physical.” Come on now, let’s not be hypocrites, okay? Must I start my rant by pointing at women’s gear in athletics? This is a non-issue to me.
Or maybe some women are “pushing back” because they don’t admit to the fact that they (also, like men) gamble? So just for the sake of data, here: Gambling Commission surveys show that about 42 percent to 44 percent of women have gambled within a four-week period, largely driven by lotteries, scratchcards, and bingo. Meanwhile, women now make up roughly one-third (around 32 percent) of all sports bettors in the U.S., according to recent data from industry surveys like Morgan Stanley and the American Gaming Association. Those are significant percentages.
But then, if you got extra dough, just place a bet and enjoy. Okay? Let Sydney earn some endorsement $. It's legal. (Photo: Yahoo.) ๐คจ๐๐คจ






